A Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG) is a unique type of image format. Unlike other varieties, SVGs don’t rely on unique pixels to make up the images you see. Instead, they use ‘vector’ data.
For more information, please visit our website.
By using SVGs, you get images that can scale up to any resolution, which comes in handy for web design among plenty of other use cases. In this article, we’ll ask the question: What is an SVG file? We’ll then teach you how to use the format.
Let’s get to it!
Subscribe To Our Youtube Channel
SVGs are graphics built using vectors. For the uninitiated, a vector is an element with a specific magnitude and direction. In theory, you can generate almost any type of graphics you want using a collection of vectors. Take this image of a blue rectangle with a black border and shadow, for example:
This is another kind of image file called a Portable Network Graphic (PNG), used for illustrations and drawings. If you wanted to replicate something similar using vector graphics, you’d need to generate it with XML code (the same found in use for sitemaps.) The following code could achieve the same result:
In theory, if you take this code and drop it into an HTML file, you’ll see a similar set of rectangles to the PNG – that is, as long as the browser you use supports SVG files. Although both images look the same, SVG files offer a whole host of benefits that other formats don’t. For example, SVGs are capable of retaining image quality as they scale up or down.
If you keep zooming in on the PNG rectangle, you’ll notice its quality begins to downgrade at some point. With more complex pixel-based graphics, the degradation becomes evident much faster. However, SVGs look good at practically any resolution.
Many websites use formats such as PNG and JPEG almost interchangeably. SVGs aren’t quite as versatile, though. If you try to re-create a complex photograph using vectors, you’ll usually end up with massive and unusable SVG files.
The SVG format is a fantastic option for a whole set of other scenarios, though:
Since SVGs use the XML format, this also makes them both searchable and indexable. Screen readers can interpret SVG files as long as you use the correct accessibility tags.
Finally, SVG files tend to be much smaller than high-resolution equivalents in other formats. On paper, this means you may be able to cut down some of your page sizes and decrease loading times. However, unless you plan to convert most of your images to SVGs, the performance increase will probably be minimal.
There are two approaches you can take when it comes to SVG files. You can create them from scratch or take an existing image and convert it. Let’s start with the manual method.
Creating an SVG file usually doesn’t involve you typing out vector information as we did earlier. That was just an example to show the concept. Instead, you create SVGs like any other graphics – by using a design program and saving the file out as an SVG. Many modern graphic design tools support SVGs out of the box. Some top options include:
The last two options in this list are open-source solution. This makes them a great option to experiment with creating SVGs without paying for premium software. In fact, they may be all you need.
If you don’t have any experience with graphic design, creating your own logos or other elements for your website will be a challenge. In this case, your best bet will be to take existing images and convert them into SVGs.
There are a lot of free tools you can use to convert images from other formats into SVGs. Most of the software we mentioned in the last section enables you to open your images and save them as SVG files.
If you don’t want to download any software, you can also use online conversion tools – and there are plenty of services you can turn to. One example is Vector Magic, which you can use to convert all manner of filetypes into SVGs:
We like this particular tool because it shows you a preview of your SVG file before you download it. You can also use a built-in editor to make small changes and corrections before downloading the file:
Of course, this is just one option. Other PNG and JPG to SVG converter services include Convertio, and Img2Go. You’ll want to do some research to find the most suitable solution for your needs.
In our experience, most SVG converters offer results of similar quality. For the best possible results, the converter you use doesn’t matter as much as the images you select.
As a rule of thumb, it only makes sense to use the SVG format for ‘simple’ images – that is, images with defined borders and clean lines. The more complex the image, the more likely it is you’ll end up with a massive SVG file that’s a chore to edit manually or animate.
SVGs aren’t all that hard to use. Adding an SVG file to your website is as easy as taking its code and pasting it within an HTML document wherever you want the image to go.
If you and your site’s visitors use browsers that support SVG files (and most do these days), they’ll be able to see the element. Animating SVGs is, of course, trickier since it requires the use of CSS.
The process changes if you’re using WordPress, though. The Content Management System (CMS) doesn’t support SVGs out of the box. If you want to enable SVG support so you can upload files directly into your website, you’ll want to use a plugin such as Safe SVG:
It’s also possible to enable SVG support in WordPress manually, but the process is much more involved. In this case, using a plugin is the safer option.
Adapting your website to use SVG files is much easier than you might imagine. The real challenge lies in designing SVGs from scratch or choosing the right images to convert to the format. Fortunately, there are plenty of tools you can use to do both.
Some great options include Adobe Illustrator, InDesign, and GIMP. Using those tools, you can create and convert existing images into SVGs. If you’re using WordPress, you can upload those SVGs using the Safe SVG plugin, then have fun animating them.
Do you have any questions about how to use SVG files? Let’s talk about them in the comments section below!
Article image thumbnail by VectorsMarket / shutterstock.com
SVG images have advantages that should make them an essential part of any developer’s toolkit. While they share a few similarities with JPG, PNG, and WebP image types, SVGs have very different DNA. In this article, we’ll highlight the characteristics that help set them apart from other image types, such as scalability, small file sizes, and SEO-friendly metadata structure. We’ll also show you how to style your SVGs using CSS instead of a graphics program, and highlight why SVGs are effectively “future proof” thanks to indefinite scaling.
SVG images work very well when the image itself is relatively simple. They’re often used as logos, buttons, icons, and nav bars, roles for which they are ideally suited. They’re not ideal for images with a lot of detail, such as photographs. For those, it’s usually best to stick with PNG or WebP files.
Most image files–including PNG, WebP, JPG, and TIFF–are bitmap based. Also known as a raster image, this means they consist of a set amount of pixels. This doesn’t present any problem when scaling an image down, but the trouble quickly shows up if you try to increase the size. You’re presented with jagged lines, blurry artifacts, and a pixelated mess.
SVG images do not have this issue. The full name, Scalable Vector Graphics, gives us a clue as to why. Vector images use a mathematical formula to define their shapes, borders, and colors, and then display those as pixels on your screen. This makes them infinitely scalable in a way a bitmap image can never be.
SVG files are written as XML text files, and can be created and edited the same way. Here’s what a very simple SVG file looks like under the hood:
That SVG file would render a 250 pixels wide, blue square.
WebP files are usually smaller than JPGs and PNGs, but all three suffer from the exact same problem when it comes to scalability. The pixels present when the image was created determine its maximum resolution. Scaling it past that point will significantly decrease the quality.
With competitive price and timely delivery, SINAVA sincerely hope to be your supplier and partner.
Explore more:Not so with SVG images! There are no pixels, just mathematics. Basically, this means SVGs can scale indefinitely without a reduction of quality. Magical.
We’ve mentioned it already, but it’s probably the single biggest advantage to using an SVG over a PNG or JPEG image: SVG graphics will scale indefinitely and remain super sharp at any size.
Food for thought: Small SVGs with little detail, such as navigation bar icons, may look out of place or too simplistic if blown up to the size of a storefront banner or billboard. Every case is different, but context and a good eye are important when deciding whether to scale an SVG.
This is another substantial advantage. Due to the nature of vector images, the data that determines the file size are the layers, effects, masks, colors, and gradients used.
In comparison, bitmap-based images record each and every pixel in the image as well as the quantity of colors used. Admittedly, it’s a little more complicated than that, but the thing to take away from this is that for the most part, a bitmap-based image file will be more expensive than an SVG counterpart.
On top of this, you can minimize the size of your SVG files by compressing them with gzip. This means that fewer bytes need to be sent from the server or CDN if gzip compression is enabled.
That’s right. And this means that you don’t need to know your way around any design software to make a small modification like a color change. In fact, if you’ve done any sort of web design or frontend development, you’ll likely have no difficulties adding a gradient to a shape or increasing the thickness of a stroke.
The XML-based nature of SVGs offers opportunities for metadata far beyond the “title” and “alt” attributes offered by most image types. Keywords, descriptions, and links can all be included in SVG files, making the content more recognizable for search engines and improving overall accessibility.
Unlike other image types that have to be downloaded from the server as an external resource, SVGs can be embedded into the HTML code, allowing them to be searched and indexed. You can also modify the styling of that SVG using CSS. Also, if you are caching your HTML pages then this means the embedded SVGs will automatically be cached too.
The scalability of SVGs effectively makes them future proof. There was a time when pixel density was a hot topic in the design community. New cell phones and tablets were becoming available, with beautifully rich displays…and most of the JPGs and PNGs used on websites suddenly looked like garbage on handheld devices.
The solution? Generate another instance of the image at double the resolution and label it “@2x”. Now the image looks lovely and crisp on the latest iPhone!
If you were sensible, you also detected the user’s resolution in advance, and only served the “@2x” image if required, as doing so was more expensive in terms of file size.
It may seem like a digression, but back then newer screens with higher pixel densities were creating additional headaches for both designers and developers. The very nature of an SVG image means it’s possible to scale them to whatever size is required.
This is where SVGs really excel. Having the ability to edit SVGs directly with a text editor means they can be animated, making it super easy to inject some interactivity into your site. These animations can be as simple or as complicated as you prefer. Similar to HTML, SVGs are also represented by the DOM (document object model) meaning that they can be manipulated with JavaScript too.
Nothing is perfect. And there are a couple of instances where you should potentially opt for raster images over SVGs.
We mentioned this earlier, but if you’re dealing with photographs, then you should undoubtedly opt for a bitmap-based image. There are not many instances where you would encounter an SVG photograph, so it’s improbable you’d ever have to make this decision.
Similarly, there are situations where a complicated SVG contains so many shapes, colors, gradients and masks that it actually starts to outweigh a JPG or PNG in file size. It’s rare to encounter this, but it’s a definite possibility.
This relies on some TLC when creating SVGs in a design application such as Adobe Illustrator or Inkscape. Empty group folders and unused, redundant layers can append unnecessary junk to the overall file size. Additionally, older SVGs generally contain an abundance of garbage in the markup and are considerably more expensive than necessary. Consider running SVGs through a minifier when you export during the design process to avoid such complications.
There are several optimization tools out there including a Node.js tool for optimizing SVG files. And thank you to Jordan, who shared this non-node solution called SVGOMG in the comments.
SVGs can massively outweigh a counterpart PNG if not created or optimized in the correct fashion. But usually, the file size will be smaller. Just don’t be put off if you encounter an individual SVG to be double the file size of a PNG equivalent.
Icons are where all of the advantages of this file format really become apparent. No longer are multiple icons in several colors and sizes required which massively simplifies the design and development process. To articulate this further, let’s look at life before SVGs came along…
Before SVGs were a thing, icons were honestly a bit of a pain for both designers and developers. More often than not, a product would feature 20+ icons and each icon would require an active state (usually the primary color), an inactive/disabled state, and occasionally additional states (such as a hover state).
Bitmap images are not editable using CSS, so each icon state required its own file.
When higher pixel density screens became a thing, it also became necessary to generate a “@2x” and “@3x” version of image assets for higher resolution displays.
The savings in file size can easily add up when we’re dealing with a lot of icons. As an example, we can take a heart SVG icon from Material Icons, and decide that we want three color variations to represent an active state, an inactive state, and a disabled state.
Using the active state of our icon, we can also produce the other 2 icon states by adjusting the CSS styling. So we only need one SVG file to generate all 3 icons!
We would need an independent file for each icon state if we were relying on bitmap images.
Additionally, to guarantee the bitmap versions look sharp on all types of devices, we need to generate a set of these icons at double and triple the dimensions of the baseline resolution (“@2x” and “@3x” respectively).
That leaves us with nine PNG icons to manage! A single SVG file would give us identical results. The PNG icons total 29KB. The single SVG file is 1K.
It’s a staggering difference. Sure, 29KB doesn’t sound considerable, but this is in reference to a single icon. When you have 30 icons, the difference in file size becomes more of a complication…
SVG: 1KB * 30 = 30KB.
PNG: 29KB * 30 = 870KB.
That’s a % increase over the single SVG. Of course, these are averages, but it’s a tremendous increase in size nonetheless.
You can usually expect at least a 50% reduction in file size when opting for SVG icons instead of PNGs. Particularly if you are optimizing your SVG icons and want them to render perfectly on any type of resolution or display.
SVG files are easier to manage, usually improve the load speed of your web pages, and won’t require an update every time a new resolution display comes on the market.
Additionally, you can animate and make modifications to the styling of your SVGs without needing or knowing how to use a design application like Photoshop or Sketch.
Got any other cool tips or uses for SVG you would like to share? Let us know in the comments section below
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Svg.
Comments
Please Join Us to post.
0