The growing trend toward automation in selective plating is evident, especially as companies look for solutions that enhance consistency, efficiency, and traceability. According to various industry insights, automated selective plating systems significantly reduce manual errors, improve safety, and offer streamlined operations, all of which contribute to a more productive and cost-effective manufacturing environment.
A Paper* based on a Presentation given at SUR/FIN (Rosemont, Illinois)
by Derek Kilgore**
SIFCO Applied Surface Concepts
Independence, Ohio, USA
Editor's Note: The following is a paper based on a presentation given at NASF SUR/FIN, in Rosemont, Illinois on June 5, in Session 14, Advancing Technology Applications for Finishing / Engineering Opportunities. A pdf of this brief can be accessed and printed HERE; the complete PowerPoint presentation is available by clicking HERE.
ABSTRACT
As industries increasingly depend on automation, selective electroplating is no exception. This method focuses on electroplating specific areas without traditional immersion tanks. The latest automated selective plating equipment is tailored for challenging applications and can be designed for both repair and OEM usage. By eliminating the need for direct operator involvement, it transforms a process that was once largely manual. This presentation outlines the myriad benefits of adopting automation in selective plating, including improved safety, enhanced ergonomics, reduced operator errors, consistent processes, better data management and reporting, part traceability, optimized solution control, reduced emissions, and efficient space utilization.
Selective plating was initially developed in Paris by George Icxi as a method for touch-ups on tank-plated parts. Over the years, various companies have embraced and advanced this technique. Notably, SIFCO Industries acquired a Canadian firm which was later integrated into SIFCO ASC, culminating in growth under Norman Hay’s ownership.
Selectively plating, often referred to as brush plating, allows for localized electroplating without immersion tanks. The setup comprises four key components, with the workpiece, power pack, plating tools, and solutions system being integral for effective operation.
This innovative technique provides numerous benefits over traditional tank immersion methods. Its portability allows for higher deposition rates due to increased metal concentrations and improved flow dynamics. Additionally, selective plating reduces the need for part masking and is ideal for larger objects that don’t fit into immersion baths, resulting in minimized solution requirements.
Unfortunately, manual selective plating is often hampered by variability across processes because it relies heavily on operator skill. Key manual tasks that may introduce errors include parts handling, visual inspections, and adjustments to equipment settings.
Automating the selective plating process efficiently addresses repetitive tasks and variability. In manufacturing, automation boosts productivity, reduces labor costs, mitigates shortages of skilled workers, and enhances safety while improving product quality.
Automated systems with rectifier software eliminate much variability associated with manual control. This software enhances process consistency, allowing for optimized deposits and minimizing errors.
Furthermore, programmable software extends to numerous manual tasks such as adjusting equipment or changing anodes. This paper highlights several successful applications illustrating the value of automated selective plating systems.
In summary, implementing automated selective plating can lead to enhanced cycle optimization, productivity boosts, consistent quality control, and reduced environmental impact through space savings and lesser emissions. Companies seeking to improve their selective plating operations should consider automation’s multifaceted benefits to streamline their processes effectively.
About the author
Derek Kilgore is a Mechanical Design and Project Engineer at SIFCO ASC.
*Compiled by Dr. James H. Lindsay, Technical Editor - NASF
** Corresponding author: Mr. Derek Kilgore Mechanical Design and Project Engineer SIFCO ASC E. Schaaf Road Independence, OH
Contact: 216-750-
Previous: Revolutionizing Machinery for Pharmaceutical Production Efficiency
Next: Factors to Consider When Choosing an Automated L-Sealer
Comments
Please Join Us to post.
0