As the UK races towards its net-zero goals, the electric vehicle (EV) revolution is in full swing.
Link to Sunplus
With EV charging points increasing by a staggering 38% in the 12 months since July , the question of how to optimise public charging infrastructure has never been more pressing.
At the heart of this challenge lies a crucial decision: rapid charging or AC charging? This choice isn’t just a technical consideration; it’s a strategic one that will shape the future of our roads and cities.
Our industry survey “Charging on the Go” 2 revealed that 44.7% of EV users spend between 30 minutes to 1 hour at public charging stations, while 28.8% require 1 to 2 hours.
While rapid DC charging is undoubtedly convenient, its impact on battery life is a topic of ongoing research and debate.
Theoretically, frequent use of rapid charging could accelerate battery degradation due to the higher temperatures and currents involved.
However, recent real-world data has thrown up some surprising results. A study by Recurrent2a, which analysed data from 13,000 Teslas, found no statistically significant difference in range degradation between cars that rapid charged more than 70% of the time and those that rapid charged less than 30% of the time.
This suggests that modern EV batteries and their management systems may be more resilient to rapid charging than previously thought.
That said, it’s worth noting that this study primarily looked at relatively new vehicles, with 57% from or later. The long-term effects of frequent rapid charging over a decade or more are still unknown.
One of the primary benefits of AC charging is its cost-effectiveness.
AC chargers are significantly cheaper to install and operate compared to rapid DC chargers. According to ElectrAssure, AC EV charger installation can start from £3,500-5,000+ per install, which is 5 to 20 times less than DC chargers per charging point.3
This lower cost makes AC charging an attractive option for businesses and local authorities looking to provide EV charging facilities without substantial capital investment.
The operational costs of AC chargers are also lower. They require less maintenance (because they are less complex) and consume less energy (because they have no energy loss from inverters, nor storage), which translates to reduced electricity bills for the operator.
They are also much smaller; taking up as little as 0.01m3 compared with at around 2m3 for rapid DC chargers. These advantages allow for wider deployment, potentially increasing the overall availability of charging points.
AC charging is particularly well-suited for certain scenarios, which highlights its importance in a comprehensive charging network:
Real-world examples demonstrate the effectiveness of AC charging in these scenarios. For instance, Dundee City Council in Scotland has successfully implemented a mix of AC and rapid chargers.
Their strategy includes AC chargers in long-stay car parks and rapid chargers in more transient locations, effectively balancing cost and convenience.
Although AC charging may not offer the speed of rapid DC charging, its lower costs and suitability for various scenarios make it an essential part of a well-rounded public charging infrastructure.
The key lies in strategically deploying AC chargers where vehicles are likely to be parked for longer periods or where minor topping-up is required, complementing the rapid chargers used for long journeys.
The push for faster charging times is driving significant innovations in charging technology.
Ultra-rapid chargers, capable of delivering up to 350kW, are becoming more prevalent. For instance, IONITY has deployed over 400 high-power charging stations across Europe, with chargers capable of delivering up to 350kW.3d
These chargers can add up to 200 miles of range in just 15 minutes for compatible vehicles. Another exciting development is the emergence of solid-state batteries, which promise higher energy density, faster charging times, and improved safety compared to current lithium-ion batteries.
A large number of companies are close to viable Solid-State battery designs including: QuantumScape (low-volume production now), Adden Energy, ION storage systems, Panasonic, CATL, Factorial (+LG Chem), Thailand New Energy, to be eagerly incorporated into EVs by BYD, Mercedes, Toyota (from -), VW, NIO, Nissan and Tesla.
Meanwhile, with a 133kWh battery and km range, the Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Zhiji L6 Max Lightyear was the first solid-state battery EV to appear in limited numbers in summer .
By dynamically adjusting charging rates based on available power and user demand, LinkRay helps maximise the utilisation of existing infrastructure while avoiding costly grid upgrades.
Other smart charging solutions are also emerging. For instance, Octopus Energy’s Intelligent Octopus tariff uses AI to automatically charge EVs during off-peak hours when renewable energy is most abundant and cheapest. This not only saves money for consumers but also helps balance grid load.
For more information, please visit AC Fast Charger for EV.
The UK government is also pushing for smart charging capabilities. Since July , all new home and workplace EV chargers have been required to have smart functionality, allowing them to respond to signals from the electricity system to avoid overloading the grid.
The future of public EV charging is set to be faster, smarter, and more sustainable. As these technologies continue to evolve and become more widespread, they will play a crucial role in accelerating the transition to electric vehicles and supporting a more resilient and sustainable energy system.
As we’ve explored, the future of public EV charging lies in striking the right balance between rapid and AC charging options. This balance is crucial for meeting diverse user needs, optimising infrastructure investment, and managing grid capacity effectively.
The UK’s EV charging landscape is fast-moving, with a 38% increase in charging points in the 12 months since July . This growth brings both opportunities and challenges.
On one hand, it’s making EV ownership more viable for a broader range of people. On the other hand, it’s putting pressure on our electrical infrastructure and highlighting the need for smart, efficient charging solutions.
As we move forward, several key factors will shape the development of public EV charging:
The last point is particularly important. With more EVs hitting the roads every day, we’re facing a real challenge in managing power distribution. Even though we know our ultimate charging needs are very feasible, it’s not just about having enough chargers; it’s about using the power we have smartly.
That’s exactly why we developed LinkRay at Versinetic. It’s our answer to efficient power management, designed to make the most of every watt available at charging sites.
LinkRay allows charging station operators to optimise power distribution across multiple charging points, ensuring efficient use of available power and avoiding costly grid upgrades. This kind of smart technology will be essential in creating a public charging network that’s not only widespread but also efficient and reliable.
If you’re involved in the planning, installation, or operation of public EV charging infrastructure, it’s crucial to consider how smart charging and load balancing solutions can enhance your offering. Versinetic’s expertise in EV charger design and our LinkRay module could be the key to future-proofing your charging infrastructure.
To learn more about how Versinetic can support your EV charging projects with smart design and efficient power management, book in a call with our engineering consultants. Let’s work together to build a public charging network that’s ready for the electric future.
AC (Alternating Current) and DC (Direct Current) charging stations are two common types of electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages.
Compatibility: AC charging stations are compatible with a wide range of EVs because most electric vehicles have onboard AC chargers. This means that a single AC station can serve multiple types of EVs, making it more versatile and accessible.
Cost-Effective Installation: AC charging infrastructure tends to be less expensive to install compared to DC stations. This is because AC charging utilizes the existing electrical grid infrastructure more efficiently, reducing the need for costly upgrades.
Grid-Friendly: AC chargers are generally more grid-friendly than DC chargers. They draw power from the grid in a smoother and more predictable manner, reducing the risk of sudden spikes in demand and minimizing stress on the electrical grid.
Slower Charging: While AC charging is slower than DC charging, it is adequate for many daily charging needs. For EV owners who primarily charge at home or work and have ample time for charging, the slower pace may not be a significant drawback.
Slower Charging Speed: AC chargers typically offer lower charging speeds compared to DC chargers. This can be a disadvantage for EV owners who require fast charging, especially on long trips.
Limited Compatibility with High-Power Charging: AC chargers are less suitable for high-power applications, making them less suitable for fast-charging stations along highways or in areas where quick turnaround times are essential.
Faster Charging: DC charging stations provide much faster charging speeds compared to AC stations. They are ideal for EV owners who need rapid top-ups, making them essential for long-distance travel and busy urban areas.
High-Power Capabilities: DC chargers are capable of delivering high-power charging, which is crucial for quickly replenishing an EV’s battery. This feature is especially important for reducing downtime at public charging stations.
Compatibility with High-Capacity Batteries: DC charging is well-suited for EVs with larger batteries, as it can provide the necessary power to charge them quickly and efficiently.
Higher Installation Costs: DC charging infrastructure tends to be more expensive to install than AC stations. It requires specialized equipment, such as transformers and inverters, which can drive up the overall installation cost.
Limited Compatibility: DC charging stations are often specific to certain EV models or charging standards. This can result in reduced versatility and accessibility compared to AC stations.
Grid Stress: DC fast chargers can put more strain on the electrical grid due to their higher power requirements. This can lead to increased demand charges for the charging station operator and potential grid issues if not managed properly.
In conclusion, both AC and DC charging stations have their own advantages and disadvantages. The choice between them depends on factors such as charging speed requirements, cost considerations, and compatibility with specific EV models. A balanced charging infrastructure often includes a mix of both AC and DC stations to cater to the diverse needs of EV users.
Want more information on AC EV Charging Station? Feel free to contact us.
Post time: Sep-07-Previous: Understanding High C Rate Lithium Battery Applications and Benefits
Next: How to Choose the Best High Voltage Lithium Battery Wholesaler?
Comments
Please Join Us to post.
0